civics.gg/H.R. 8680
H.R. 8680·FederalIn CommitteeDefense

Armed Forces Carry Rights Protection Act of 2026

Sponsored by Rep. Crank, Jeff [R-CO-5] (R-CO)Introduced May 7, 2026Read full text ↗

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8680 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8680

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 to establish a rebuttable presumption in favor of authorizing a member of the Armed Forces to carry a personal firearm on a military installation.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

May 7, 2026

Mr. Crank introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 to establish a rebuttable presumption in favor of authorizing a member of the Armed Forces to carry a personal firearm on a military installation.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Armed Forces Carry Rights Protection Act of 2026''.

SEC. 2. REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION IN FAVOR OF AUTHORIZING A MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES TO CARRY A PERSONAL FIREARM ON A MILITARY INSTALLATION.

Section 526 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114-92; 10 U.S.C. 2672 note) is amended-- (1) by inserting ``(a) Establishment.--'' before ``Not later''; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsections: ``(b) Presumption.--In the process under subsection (a), there shall be a rebuttable presumption in favor of authorizing a member to carry a firearm owned by such member while the member-- ``(1) is on the installation, center, or facility; and ``(2) is not performing duty at such installation, center, or facility. ``(c) Written Denial.--A denial of authorization pursuant to such process shall-- ``(1) be in writing; and ``(2) include an objective, clearly describable, and individualized basis for such denial.''. <all>

Ask About This Bill

Have questions about this legislation?

Our AI can explain provisions, analyze impacts, and answer questions in plain English.

What are the main provisions?Who benefits from this bill?How would this affect me?
Create free account to chat

Already have an account? Sign in

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

Citizen Lobby

Make your voice heard on this bill.

0 support0 oppose
Contact Your RepresentativePlus

Upgrade to Plus to generate an AI letter and send it to your House representative.

AI Summary

Get an instant AI-powered breakdown of this bill — what it does, who it affects, and what matters.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

Historical Perspectives

Hear what historical figures and modern thinkers might say about this legislation.

Founding Fathers

🪶
Jefferson
🏛️
Hamilton
⚖️
Madison

Historical Leaders

🦁
Churchill
💼
Thatcher

Modern Thinkers

📈
Buffett
🍎
Jobs
🔭
Einstein

See how Jefferson, Churchill, or Einstein would react to this bill.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in