civics.gg/H.R. 5268
H.R. 5268·FederalIn CommitteeCivil Rights

FAIR Trucking Act

Sponsored by Rep. Hinson, Ashley [R-IA-2] (R-IA)Introduced September 10, 2025Read full text ↗

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 5268 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 5268

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for Federal district court jurisdiction for highway accident actions against interstate motor carriers.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

September 10, 2025

Mrs. Hinson (for herself and Mr. Barrett) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for Federal district court jurisdiction for highway accident actions against interstate motor carriers.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Forum Accountability and Integrity in Roadway Trucking Act'' or the ``FAIR Trucking Act''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JURISDICTION FOR HIGHWAY ACCIDENT ACTIONS AGAINST INTERSTATE MOTOR CARRIERS.

(a) Application of Federal Jurisdiction.--Section 1332 of title 28, United States Code, is amended-- (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following: ``(e)(1) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action-- ``(A) alleging bodily harm or loss of life involving one or more commercial motor vehicles, as defined in section 31101 of title 49, operating on a public road in interstate commerce; ``(B) in which the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $5,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs; and ``(C) is a civil action in which-- ``(i) any plaintiff is a citizen of a State different from any defendant; ``(ii) any plaintiff is a foreign state or a citizen or subject of a foreign state and any defendant is a citizen of a State; or ``(iii) any plaintiff is a citizen of a State and any defendant is a foreign state or a citizen or subject of a foreign state. ``(2) Citizenship of plaintiffs shall be determined for purposes of paragraph (1) as of the date of filing of the complaint or amended complaint, or, if the case stated by the initial pleading is not subject to Federal jurisdiction, as of the date of service by plaintiffs of an amended pleading, motion, or other paper, indicating the existence of Federal jurisdiction. ``(3) For purposes of this subsection, an unincorporated association shall be deemed to be a citizen of the State where it has its principal place of business and the State under whose laws it is organized.''. <all>

Ask About This Bill

Have questions about this legislation?

Our AI can explain provisions, analyze impacts, and answer questions in plain English.

What are the main provisions?Who benefits from this bill?How would this affect me?
Create free account to chat

Already have an account? Sign in

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

Citizen Lobby

Make your voice heard on this bill.

0 support0 oppose
Contact Your RepresentativePlus

Upgrade to Plus to generate an AI letter and send it to your House representative.

AI Summary

Get an instant AI-powered breakdown of this bill — what it does, who it affects, and what matters.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

Historical Perspectives

Hear what historical figures and modern thinkers might say about this legislation.

Founding Fathers

🪶
Jefferson
🏛️
Hamilton
⚖️
Madison

Historical Leaders

🦁
Churchill
💼
Thatcher

Modern Thinkers

📈
Buffett
🍎
Jobs
🔭
Einstein

See how Jefferson, Churchill, or Einstein would react to this bill.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in