civics.gg/H.R. 3891
H.R. 3891·FederalIn CommitteeImmigration

Northern Border Security and Staffing Reform Act

Sponsored by Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8] (R-MN)Introduced June 10, 2025Read full text ↗

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 3891 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 3891

To amend the Northern Border Security Review Act to require an annual report and update the northern border threat analysis, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 10, 2025

Mr. Stauber (for himself, Mr. Langworthy, Mr. Bergman, Mr. Tiffany, Ms. Tenney, Ms. Stefanik, and Mrs. Hinson) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To amend the Northern Border Security Review Act to require an annual report and update the northern border threat analysis, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Northern Border Security and Staffing Reform Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND SENSE OF CONGRESS.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following: (1) Between 2002 and 2011, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) roughly doubled their staffing levels, and according to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Office Workload Staffing Model that calculates the number of CBP officers estimated to carry out the CBP mission at each air, sea, and land port of entry in the United States, states that the current staffing gap between the model results and the current staffing levels indicates a nationwide staffing shortage of 5,800 CBP officers. (2) The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law 110-161) made Customs and Border Protection Officers eligible for the 1.7 percent enhanced law enforcement officer (LEO) retirement system, which allows law enforcement officers to retire at age 50 with 20 years of service, or at any age with 25 years of service. (3) On April 30, 2024, then-Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner Troy A. Miller testified before the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives that ports of entry face a 400 percent increase in retirements in 2028. (4) This retirement surge would disproportionately affect ports of entry along the northern border. (5) A 400 percent retirement surge would leave ports of entry along the northern border understaffed and unable to protect the American people from threats. (6) Ports of entry along the northern border face unique staffing challenges due to their harsh winters, isolated locations, limited economic opportunities, and scarce housing markets. These factors make it difficult for northern ports of entry to recruit and retain officers who are not from its region. (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that U.S. Customs and Border Protection must begin a hiring surge of qualified recruits at ports of entry along the northern border to avoid the disastrous effects of the impending retirement surge, future retirement surges, and current staffing shortage.

SEC. 3. NORTHERN BORDER THREAT ANALYSIS UPDATE.

(a) In General.--The Northern Border Security Review Act (Public Law 114-267) is amended-- (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``180 days after the date of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Northern Border Security and Staffing Reform Act and every five years thereafter''; (2) in subsection (b)-- (A) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through (6) as paragraphs (7) through (10), respectively; and (B) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraphs: ``(3) the current number of U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers and agents deployed along the northern border compared with the projected demand over the following years for such officers and agents; ``(4) the future retirement surges of such officers and agents, associated risks, and plans for mitigation of such risks; ``(5) any housing challenges along the northern border for such officers and agents; ``(6) the development of local recruiting plans to promote the hiring of new U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers and agents local to areas close to northern ports of entry;''; (3) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); (4) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection: ``(c) Additional Elements.--The Secretary of Homeland Security shall also include in each threat analysis required under subsection (a) the following: ``(1) A plan, and any updates thereto, to address future retirement surges, staffing challenges, and staffing shortages along the northern border. ``(2) An assessment of the feasibility of the use of various recruitment and retention tools, including direct hire authority, recruitment, retention, and relocation bonuses, additional pay authorities, and student loan repayment programs to address staffing shortages along the northern border.''; and (5) by adding at the end the following new subsection: ``(e) Definition.--In this section, the term `local recruiting plans' means plans designed to motivate, recruit, hire, assist, and mentor local qualified candidates to apply for and have a career in U.S. Customs and Border Protection at nearby ports of entry.''. <all>

Ask About This Bill

Have questions about this legislation?

Our AI can explain provisions, analyze impacts, and answer questions in plain English.

What are the main provisions?Who benefits from this bill?How would this affect me?
Create free account to chat

Already have an account? Sign in

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

Citizen Lobby

Make your voice heard on this bill.

0 support0 oppose
Contact Your RepresentativePlus

Upgrade to Plus to generate an AI letter and send it to your House representative.

AI Summary

Get an instant AI-powered breakdown of this bill — what it does, who it affects, and what matters.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

Historical Perspectives

Hear what historical figures and modern thinkers might say about this legislation.

Founding Fathers

🪶
Jefferson
🏛️
Hamilton
⚖️
Madison

Historical Leaders

🦁
Churchill
💼
Thatcher

Modern Thinkers

📈
Buffett
🍎
Jobs
🔭
Einstein

See how Jefferson, Churchill, or Einstein would react to this bill.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in